Q: 1
What are the maturity levels of the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Method-ology? Note: There
are 2 answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
Its B and C, not D. D looks like a trap since implementation usually comes after those maturity steps.
Its B, C
Man, SAP loves their frameworks. B and C tbh, just like most practice sets say.
C or D, but is the question asking for only the strategic/planning levels or also operational maturity? That would change my pick.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 2
Which SAP Cloud Integration process event allows you to run integration flows directly after
deployment?
Options
Discussion
Seen this in a couple practice exams and the SAP official guide. D is usually correct for triggering flows post-deployment.
Had something like this in a mock. D
If "Run Once" wasn't enabled on the Timer, this answer flips. D, but it's that exact config detail that matters here.
D imo. Similar questions pop up in official guides and practice tests for SAP integration. Timer lets you trigger right after deploy.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 3
What are some aspects of "holistic integration" of the SAP Integration Suite? Note: 3 answers are
correct.
Options
Discussion
Holistic integration covers different styles, so I'd pick A, C, and E for this one.
A C, E is what SAP means by holistic. Process Integration (A), Event Integration (C), and Data Integration (E) cover all styles-process automation, async events, and data flows. B (Cloud Integration) sounds tempting but it's more a deployment/tech type than an integration style here. Pretty sure that's how SAP breaks it down. Open to other takes if someone has seen different SAP docs.
A C, E
Cloud Integration (B) isn't usually counted as a pillar of holistic integration for SAP Suite, it's more about Process (A), Event (C), and Data Integration (E). Those three styles cover business process flows, async events, and bulk data sync. Pretty sure A, C, E is what SAP highlights for this approach. Correct me if I missed some nuance.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 4
In the Cloud Integration capability within SAP Integration Suite, which internal message format is
used?
Options
Discussion
A tbh. The internal message format in SAP Cloud Integration is definitely XML, not JSON or XSLT. JSON is just a format at the edges and XSLT is for transformation, but messages flow as XML inside. XML makes it easier for built-in processing steps. Anyone disagree?
Pretty sure it's A (XML). I remember seeing that SAP Cloud Integration always works with XML inside, then uses converters if you get other formats in. Not 100% though, anyone confirm?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 5
What must you do to find out which entity sets are available in the OData V2.0 interface?
Options
Discussion
Option B
B . Had something like this in a mock and the metadata doc ($metadata endpoint) listed all entity sets, not just names but structure too. Service doc (A) shows less detail. Pretty confident unless SAP changed something.
I see a few folks mentioning A, but you’ll only get the full entity set details from B (the metadata doc). The service doc lists some entry points, but if you want every available set and their structure, metadata is the way. Pretty sure that's how SAP OData works unless something's changed.
It’s B for sure. The metadata doc gives you the full list of entity sets, including their structure-option A (service document) doesn’t give all that detail. Easy to miss if you haven’t worked with OData much, but metadata is key. Anyone disagree?
A , since the service document usually lists available entity sets at the root. I know $metadata gives way more detail, but for just names or existence it feels like A could work. Anyone see it differently?
B tbh, since the metadata doc ($metadata) actually lists all the entity sets and their structure. The service doc (A) only gives you a summary or entry points. I think that's what the question is after, unless SAP changed how this works.
Maybe B. Good focus on the metadata doc, that's exactly where you'd see all the entity sets listed. Clear question.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 6
Where must you configure an HTTPS inbound adapter with OAuth 2.0 authentication?
Options
Discussion
B tbh
Why not B here? The OAuth config for HTTPS adapters is done at the iFlow level, not globally.
B is the right spot-you set up OAuth 2.0 on the inbound adapter inside the integration flow during design time. Pretty sure about this since that's where endpoint-specific settings live, not tenant-wide config. Agree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 7
You are using a Data store Operation of the type Write. Which parameter must you select to avoid
duplicate entries?
Options
Discussion
Its A
Looks like B
My pick: A here. "Overwrite Existing Message" was made for this to ensure the same Entry ID just gets replaced and you don’t get multiple copies. B looks tempting if you’re thinking about alerts, but it doesn’t actually help with duplicate records in the data store. If I’m off, let me know.
Option A seems right since "Overwrite Existing Message" prevents duplicates by replacing old messages with the same Entry ID. B is more about alert retention, not actual duplicate data. Pretty sure it's A, but open to other thoughts.
B, saw a similar scenario in practice and went with B to avoid alerts for duplicates.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 8
You want to integrate a SOAP adapter into an integration process and enable the adapter to send
messages to the integration flow. Which user role must you set up in the SOAP adapter?
Options
Discussion
B
C vs B for this one. Pretty sure it's C (ESBMessaging send) since that's the exact role required for SOAP adapter calls in CPI, not just the more generic MessagingSend. B looks tempting but it's missing the right privileges. Anyone see it differently?
Option C is usually the right one for CPI SOAP adapter access. The ESBMessaging.send role gives the needed permission for inbound SOAP calls to actually hit the integration flow, otherwise you get a 403 error. B feels close but lacks the specific rights. I think C is correct, unless SAP changed something lately. Anyone disagree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 9
What are some advantages of creating an OData interface through an API pro-vider? Note: There are
2 correct answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
C , but only if the API provider supports interactive documentation. D is valid because OpenAPI spec gets built out automatically for OData. Edge case: sometimes Swagger UI won't be there if disabled. Anyone disagree?
C and D, both spot on according to recent practice sets. Clear question wording made this one nice and straightforward.
B or C? RAML spec sometimes gets generated too depending on the setup, so not sure why B's not right.
Its C and D for most SAP API provider setups unless you specifically turn off Swagger UI in configs.
Looks right, C and D. SAP Integration Suite auto-generates the OpenAPI spec and gives you Swagger UI for OData APIs.
I’d say C and D here. OpenAPI spec (D) is pretty much standard for describing REST APIs now and Swagger UI (C) gets auto-generated from that. I don't think WSDL or RAML apply to OData in this SAP context. Agree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 10
You have created an API provider of the type Internet. What http response code indicates success?
Options
Discussion
Official SAP docs and some sample practice tests both show 200 (C) as standard for success with API calls. Pretty sure that's what the exam expects, but feel free to check a guide if you want to be certain.
C not A. 203 can be a trap since it's only used for partial info. 200 is universal for successful HTTP responses in APIs.
Probably C since 200 is the standard "success" HTTP code, especially for general API calls. Saw a similar question in a practice test, always expect 200 unless they ask for something more specific. Agree?
C for sure. 200 is always the classic success code for HTTP APIs, regardless of provider type. Quick question though: does the API provider ever return other 2xx codes for specific operations, or is it just asking about general success?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 1 of 20 · Page 1 / 2