Q: 1
What are the maturity levels of the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Method-ology? Note: There
are 2 answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
B and C tbh
B and D
B and C. Both fit the maturity level definition in ISA-M, not about actual implementation. Pretty sure that's what SAP means here.
If the question meant adopted/operational maturity, would D be right instead of just B and C?
Its B and C, not D. D looks like a trap since implementation usually comes after those maturity steps.
I don’t think it’s B and C. D should be one of them since implementing the integration architectural strategy feels like a maturity step, not just design or assessment. Maybe mixing up rollout stages with maturity, but I’d go with D and C here.
Official SAP guide and practice test questions point to B and C here for maturity levels in ISA-M. I've seen this type pop up in exam reviews, pretty sure that's the way to go.
Probably B and C, that's what similar exam practice recommends for ISA-M maturity levels. Official guide and practice tests usually match on those.
A is wrong, B and C. SAP just loves to mess with terminology here but B (design your hybrid integration platform) and C (assess your integration strategy) actually align with the ISA-M maturity levels. D isn't really a maturity level if you check their methodology docs. Pretty sure here, but open to challenges.
B and C fit maturity levels, not D. D is tempting but it's more about rollout than maturity in ISA-M. Agree?
Be respectful. No spam.