Q: 12
Which of the following does SAP Cloud ALM provide to make extensions clean core compliant?
Options
Discussion
Option B
B
C or B, but I think C fits better since process monitoring with Signavio keeps track of changes for compliance stuff. Maybe B is more about transports, but C still helps with clean core in my view. Open to pushback.
Option C. Business Process Monitoring with Signavio ties in with compliance tracking, so that's what I'd pick.
C , I thought business process monitoring with Signavio handled compliance since it tracks changes closely. B feels like a trap here.
Pretty sure it's B, since only Change Management with Cloud Transport Management lets you actually control and enforce extensions in a compliant way. The other options help with monitoring or service info but don't address compliance for clean core. Correct me if I'm off!
Its C. Business Process Monitoring with Signavio tracks processes so seems like it'd help ensure extensions stay correct. Not sure B actually handles all clean core compliance by itself, but SAP options are tricky here. Let me know if you think otherwise.
Change Management with SAP Cloud Transport Management is what actually enforces compliance when extending in SAP Cloud ALM. A and C are more about visibility or monitoring, not pushing compliance. Pretty confident it's B, but let me know if you see it differently.
Saw something almost the same in a practice test, went with B.
C looks like a trap here. Only B (Change Management integrated with SAP Cloud Transport Management) actively enforces clean core compliance for extensions, not just visibility. I think some might pick C for monitoring, but the question asks about actual compliance. Anyone disagree?
Be respectful. No spam.
