Q: 18
HOTSPOT
You have an Azure subscription that contains an app named Appl. App1 is hosted on the Azure App
Service instances shown in the following table.
You need to implement Azure Traffic Manager to meet the following requirements:
• App1 traffic must be assigned equally to each App Service instance in each Azure region.
• App1 traffic from North Europe must be routed to the Appl instances in the North Europe region.
• App1 traffic from North America must be routed to the Appl instances in the East US Azure region.

You need to implement Azure Traffic Manager to meet the following requirements:
• App1 traffic must be assigned equally to each App Service instance in each Azure region.
• App1 traffic from North Europe must be routed to the Appl instances in the North Europe region.
• App1 traffic from North America must be routed to the Appl instances in the East US Azure region.

Your Answer
Discussion
Curious, why not use Priority for the child Traffic Manager profiles if high availability was a concern in this scenario? Is Weighted the only option to evenly distribute traffic within each region, or does Priority ever make sense here for equal load?
Why not Priority for the second box? Wonder if Weighted is only needed for even split when there's no failover.
Geographic for the parent, Weighted for the child profiles. Using Geographic routing at the top level handles region-based requirements, and Weighted lets you split traffic equally within each region. Really clear scenario, matches what I’ve seen in other practice sets. Not 100% sure but this flow seems best.
Be respectful. No spam.