Clear question for once. B is correct since just flipping the billing model in Azure CLI doesn’t actually enable MFA for the new users, you still need to set their MFA status. Open to other takes if I missed something.
Q: 12
Your company's Azure solution makes use of Multi-Factor Authentication for when users
are not in the office. The Per Authentication option has been configured as the usage
model. After the acquisition of a smaller business and the addition of the new staff to Azure
Active Directory (Azure AD) obtains a different company and adding the new employees to
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), you are informed that these employees should also
make use of Multi-Factor Authentication. To achieve this, the Per Enabled User setting must
be set for the usage model. Solution: You reconfigure the existing usage model via the
Azure CLI. Does the solution meet the goal?
Options
Discussion
B tbh. Swapping to Per Enabled User in Azure CLI is just a billing change, not actual MFA enforcement. I get why A might look tempting if you miss that detail.
B , seen it in official guide and practice tests. CLI change only affects billing, not user MFA enforcement directly.
B . Just updating the usage model with CLI changes billing but doesn't actually enable MFA for those users. A is a trap if you don't catch that detail.
Did anyone check the official Microsoft docs on MFA models? Sometimes practice labs show subtle differences for this scenario.
B not A
B. Just changing billing with Azure CLI won't force MFA for those new staff, as far as I know.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 12 of 35