Q: 7
A security officer must testify in a civil lawsuit involving the alleged wrongful termination of a former
employee for violation of company rules. To best prepare himself for the trial, the security officer
should first;
Options
Discussion
B . Official study guide and practice exam questions always say review your own notes first to keep your facts straight before anything else. If anyone disagrees let me know, but that's what I've seen in most prep materials.
Ugh, always ASIS with these "first step" curveballs. Option B.
Its B. You want to stick to reviewing your own notes first, that way you’re relying on original details and not hearsay. D is a trap since handling evidence isn’t needed just to refresh memory.
C vs B here. I picked C since talking to the employee's attorney feels like a good practical move before getting grilled in court, at least from real-world experience. But I can see why B gets picked on the exam for refreshing your own memory first. Anyone else think C makes more sense though?
Option C since exam reports and official guides both say consulting legal counsel is key before testifying.
B but I see why some lean toward C. Usually you gotta refresh your own memory before anything else. Not 100 percent though, those ASIS questions can trip me up sometimes!
C vs D for me. Talking straight to the attorney (option C) could get you fully prepped, or maybe actually looking over the physical evidence (D) first makes more sense. Not sure B is enough as a first step.
Why not C? Reviewing with the employee's attorney seems like strong prep to me.
C or D? I feel like reviewing with the employee's attorney (C) might help you prep right away, and looking over the evidence (D) could clarify details. B seems too basic for a trial, but not sure. Open if you see it different.
B imo. C is tempting but reviewing your own records is safer to avoid coaching issues, pretty sure that's the trap here.
Be respectful. No spam.
