1. Bjarnason
E.
Wnuk
K.
& Regnell
B. (2011). A case study on challenges in creating shared understanding in large-scale requirements engineering. Information and Software Technology
53(7)
675-690. In section 4.2
"Product backlog grooming
" the authors describe the activity: "The product backlog grooming meetings were used to discuss
estimate
and break down requirements into smaller pieces." This directly supports the activities mentioned in option B.
(DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.09.006)
2. Lucassen
G.
Lammers
T.
& van der Werf
J. M. E. (2016). The use and effectiveness of user stories and a-priori mock-ups in practice. 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
174-183. The paper discusses backlog refinement as a key practice where user stories are detailed: "During backlog refinement sessions
the product owner and development team discuss user stories to clarify and estimate them." This aligns with the detailed review and update of user stories.
(DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2016.29)
3. University of California
Berkeley. (n.d.). CS 169A
Software Engineering
Lecture 4: Agile/Scrum/XP. Courseware. The lecture slides describe the Product Backlog Refinement process as including activities such as "adding detail
estimates
and order to items in the Product Backlog." This directly corresponds to reviewing and updating user stories in detail.