Q: 9
What is the primary purpose of an Al impact assessment?
Options
Discussion
B . The primary purpose of an AI impact assessment is really about anticipating and managing risks or harms related to the system, not just checking legal risks like in A. D is a bit of a trap because benefits get addressed after risk mitigation. Open if someone sees it differently.
Option B, Similar question showed up on a practice test-always about risk and harm management. If you’ve got the official guide, check that section for more detail just to be sure.
B . The whole point of an AI impact assessment is to get ahead of any possible risks or harms, not just legal stuff (that's why A doesn't cover it all). So B matches what these assessments are really for in practice, anticipating and managing negative impacts. Open to other takes if someone thinks otherwise though.
Option B matches what I saw in recent exam reports.
D . I always thought the main point of an AI impact assessment was to figure out and measure system benefits, not just the risks part. But maybe I'm missing something about current trends. Anyone else see it this way?
B tbh, since the whole idea with an AI impact assessment is to spot and handle any risks or harms the system might cause. It’s not just about legal stuff (A) or measuring benefits (D). Main focus is risk anticipation and mitigation, which lines up with what most frameworks want. I think B checks out but always open if someone disagrees.
B tbh
If the AI system is being deployed in a context where there's no direct human interaction or societal impact, does an AI impact assessment still focus primarily on harms and risks (B)? I feel like that's the default, but in edge cases like purely internal automation with no user data maybe the assessment's scope shifts. Curious if anyone else has run into wording that nudges towards A or D in those rare scenarios.
I don’t think D is right. Measuring benefits (D) sounds good but isn’t the core goal, it’s about flagging risks and harms before rollout, so B covers more ground. A is tempting but too limited in scope. Anyone disagree?
I don’t think it’s A. Legal risks are just one piece, but B is broader since it’s about anticipating and managing any risk or harm, not only legal ones. That’s what most exam versions seem to be targeting here, unless I’m missing something?
Be respectful. No spam.