Q: 6
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is
embarking on a new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify
and retain the best talent. The new talent will help the company's product team expand its payroll
offerings to companies in the healthcare and transportation sectors, including in Asia.
It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned
that human reviewers might be susceptible to bias.
Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes
and assist with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-
party Al-enabled hiring solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable
laws.
The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology
solutions. One of the procurement team's goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost
solutions. Others within the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology
solutions into the organization's operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.
The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also
questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly.
Their concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to
change.
Which other stakeholder groups should be involved in the selection and implementation of the Al
hiring tool?
Options
Discussion
Litigation and Product Development seem more relevant here. D
D tbh, since Litigation and Product Development could be key if lawsuits or real-time deployment risks are top of mind. Trap is A feels safe from a compliance view, but I think D applies in some scenarios. Could be missing something small here, open to other views.
A but if AI bias litigation was already ongoing I'd consider D. Here it hinges on procurement and compliance, so A fits.
A not C. Finance takes care of the ROI and budgeting side while Legal is key for compliance with hiring laws, especially since the rules change across regions. Similar topics came up in the official guide and sample exams. Pretty sure this is what they're looking for but open to other thoughts.
A imo, finance and legal need to be involved here. Official study guide and practice tests mention both for tech procurement scenarios like this.
Isn't Marketing more about external messaging, not compliance or legal risks? Why not A over B?
Finance and Legal (A) fits here since you need budget approval plus legal to cover all those compliance and contract issues for AI hiring, especially with laws differing everywhere. Not totally sure if compliance gets counted as a separate group, but A looks best in this scenario.
Yeah, A makes sense here. Finance needs to sign off on costs and Legal is key for handling all the compliance issues and contract stuff, especially with changing laws in different regions. Pretty standard combo for tech procurement like this, unless the scenario was all about product development or active lawsuits. Feel free to disagree if you see it differently.
A Saw a similar question on another practice test so pretty sure it's A for finance and legal, makes the most sense.
Finance and Legal (A) make the most sense here. Finance gets involved because this is a major procurement, and legal is crucial with all the shifting laws around AI and hiring across regions. I’ve seen similar case studies focus on these two for risk and compliance reasons. Pretty sure A is best, unless I’m missing a subtle angle-any counterpoints?
Be respectful. No spam.
