Q: 1
A social media company wants to use a large language model (LLM) for content moderation. The
company wants to evaluate the LLM outputs for bias and potential discrimination against specific
groups or individuals.
Which data source should the company use to evaluate the LLM outputs with the LEAST
administrative effort?
Options
Discussion
D for sure. Benchmark datasets are ready-to-go and already labeled for bias, so you don't need to set up your own framework or gather/annotate raw user data. Way less admin effort compared to using logs or starting from scratch with guidelines. Pretty confident here but open if someone sees it differently.
I don't think user-generated content (A) is the best pick here. D (Benchmark datasets) makes more sense since they're already labeled for bias and widely used for standard evaluation, so you skip all the manual setup and data cleaning. Moderation logs or guidelines would take way more admin work to adapt. Anyone disagree?
Probably D, benchmark datasets are already set up for this. Nice straightforward question.
Be respectful. No spam.