1. Afolabi, I., Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Ksentini, A., & Flinck, H. (2018). "Intent-Based Networking: A Comprehensive Survey." IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), 3023-3057.
Reference: Section III, "IBN ARCHITECTURE" (pp. 3029-3033), details the main building blocks as Intent Translation, Mapping/Orchestration, and Assurance. The paper discusses virtualization (NFV) as a technology that IBN can manage, not as a core component of the IBN architecture itself.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2845433
2. Nokia. (2020). Nokia Network Services Platform (NSP) Intent-Based Networking for Dummies, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Reference: Chapter 2, "Defining Intent-Based Networking" (pp. 11-13), outlines the key functions of an IBN system as translating intent, orchestrating services across domains, and optimizing the network through a closed feedback loop. These functions directly map to abstraction, automation, and persistence/assurance. Virtualization is not listed as a defining characteristic of the IBN system.
3. Clemm, A., Ciavaglia, L., Granville, L. Z., & Tsur, D. (2020). "Intent-Based Networking - Concepts and Definitions." Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Network Management Research Group (NMRG), draft-irtf-nmrg-ibn-concepts-definitions-03.
Reference: Section 3, "Key characteristics of an IBN system," lists characteristics such as "single source of truth," "abstraction," and "closed-loop operation." The closed-loop aspect ensures the persistence of the intended state. Virtualization is not identified as a key characteristic of the IBN system itself.