Q: 6
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit During a vPC peer switch reload, there is packet loss between the server and the router Which
action must be taken to prevent this behavior during future reloads?
Refer to the exhibit During a vPC peer switch reload, there is packet loss between the server and the router Which
action must be taken to prevent this behavior during future reloads?Options
Discussion
C vs B for me. Lowering OSPF timers (C) helps with faster neighbor recovery but doesn't fix vPC-specific issues with traffic forwarding during switch reloads. I think upping the vPC delay restore timer (B) holds off traffic until everything is fully up, which is needed to avoid those drops. Not 100% sure, but leaning B based on vPC docs. Agree?
Yeah, pretty sure B is right. Increasing the vPC delay restore timer gives everything time to sync up before forwarding starts, helps avoid those packet drops when peer switches come back online. Not 100% but that's what I've seen in similar setups.
For me, it's B, increasing the vPC delay restore timer helps prevent traffic from flowing before the control plane is ready after a reload. This avoids packet loss during sync delays. Someone correct me if I'm off here.
Be respectful. No spam.
