Pretty sure this one follows the NIST order: Prepare goes with employee training, Analyze to identifying how/where the breach was hit, Contain is about stopping it from spreading, Eradicate is root cause removal, Recover is restoring ops, and Post-Incident Handling is for improving after. I matched based on that process. Anyone disagree?

• Conduct incident response role training for employees → Prepare
• Determine how the breach was discovered and the areas that were impacted → Analyze
• Determine where it started and prevent spread → Contain
• Eliminate root cause and update system → Eradicate
• Get ops going, prevent recurrence → Recover
• Analyze/document/strengthen after attack → Post-Incident Handling

Nice and clear question layout. Mapping is:
Analyze and document the breach, and strengthen systems against future attacks → Post-Incident Handling
Conduct incident response role training for employees → Prepare
Determine where the breach started and prevent the attack from spreading → Contain
Determine how the breach was discovered and the areas that were impacted → Analyze
Eliminate the root cause of the breach and app updates to the system → Eradicate
Get systems and business operations up and running, and ensure that the same type of attack does not occur again → Recover

Had something like this in a mock. Mapping seems solid if you know the NIST flow: Prepare is training, Analyze covers how/where breach hit, Contain stops spread, Eradicate removes root cause, Recover gets ops going, and Post-Incident Handling is all about learning/improving after. Don't think there's much room for debate here but open to corrections if someone spots a mismatch.

• Prepare → Conduct incident response role training
• Analyze → How breach was discovered/areas impacted
• Contain → Prevent attack from spreading
• Eradicate → Remove root cause/update system
• Recover → Restore ops/prevent recurrence
• Post-Incident Handling → Analyze/document/strengthen systems post-event