Q: 17
Which of the following is a low-tech way of gaining unauthorized access to systems?
Options
Discussion
A for me, but I see the point about B. Usually social engineering is just talking or tricking, no real tech needed.
C or D? I get why A is correct but sometimes eavesdropping and sniffing feel pretty low-tech too, depending on context. Social engineering usually just needs persuasion though, no gadgets. Not fully sure, open to other views.
Don’t think it’s B, pretty sure A is the right choice. Social engineering can be just convincing someone, no tech required. Eavesdropping sounds low-tech but in security terms it’s more passive listening, not really about access.
B , eavesdropping seems low-tech since you just listen in. Social engineering sometimes involves tech tricks too. Eavesdropping is a trap option I think, but looks plausible here.
A tbh, social engineering is the classic low-tech route since it just relies on tricking people. Love how clear the options are on this one, makes studying easier.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 17 of 35