Q: 10
Which of the following scanning method splits the TCP header into several packets and makes it
difficult for packet filters to detect the purpose of the packet?
Options
Discussion
C . SYN/FIN scan with IP fragments is the classic way to break up the TCP header so basic filters can't read flag info easily. D doesn't actually split up the TCP header, it just probes IDs. Not 100% but this lines up with what I've seen in CEH practice.
C or D? But I'm going with C here. SYN/FIN scanning using IP fragments actually splits the TCP header, making it tough for basic packet filters to spot the scan's intent. D (IPID scanning) is more about sequence numbers, doesn't really split headers. Correct me if someone knows a recent update.
Guessing D
Not D, C is the method that splits TCP headers with IP fragments. D looks tempting but doesn't involve header fragmentation.
C imo since SYN/FIN scanning with IP fragments splits the TCP header, making it tough for simple filters to piece together what kind of scan it is. Only advanced firewalls that do fragment reassembly could reliably catch it. Anyone disagree?
Nah, not D. C is right here since it splits the TCP header up, which confuses simple filters. Saw a similar question on another practice set and D is often a trap.
C or D, but C matches what I remember from practice exams. Fragmenting the TCP header makes it harder for basic firewalls to spot the scan type. If you want more on this, the official CEH guide and hands-on labs both cover these techniques well. Not 100% sure so open to correction.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 10 of 35