Q: 6
Shane has started the static analysis of a malware and is using the tool ResourcesExtract to find more
details of the malicious program. What part of the analysis is he performing?
Options
Discussion
Option B makes sense. ResourcesExtract pulls embedded resources and string tables from executables, which lines up with a static strings search. Pretty sure about this, not dynamic since he isn’t running the malware. Agree?
B is what I'd pick, since ResourcesExtract pulls out strings and readable data from executables during static analysis. It's not really mapping dependencies, more just extracting info you can scan for IOCs. Pretty sure about this, but if someone thinks A fits better let me know.
B saw a similar question in exam reports and ResourcesExtract always points to string searching not dynamic stuff.
A
Its B. ResourcesExtract pulls out strings and resources from executables, so this would be a static strings search. If it was dynamic analysis we'd need to execute the malware, which isn't the case here.
B , pretty sure from practice tests and the official guide, but open to other ideas.
Why not C here? Static analysis means the code isn't run, which doesn't fit dynamic.
I don't think it's A here. ResourcesExtract is mostly used for string extraction in static analysis, not for listing dependencies. B makes more sense since that's its main function with malware samples.
Its B. ResourcesExtract is for pulling out strings or embedded resources, not file dependencies. A feels like a trick option here.
B tbh, ResourcesExtract is mainly used to pull strings or readable resources during static analysis. Dependency mapping is more for things like Dependency Walker, not this tool. Makes sense if you look at what static analysis usually targets.
Be respectful. No spam.