Q: 7
An engineer needs to configure a translation pattern in Cisco UCM to match dialed numbers that
start with 9011 so that the calls can be routed with a single route pattern of VH If the engineer uses
translation pattern 9011.! which two called party transformation settings must be configured in Cisco
UCM? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
B and C imo. Discard Digits Predot drops the 9011 prefix, then using +! as transform gives you E.164 format needed for international routing. Similar scenario came up in official guide labs, but open to corrections if someone thinks otherwise.
B/C tbh, discard predot and +! are what you need for proper E.164 conversion in UCM.
Option E. since it deals with international number type, seems like a good fit here.
B and C imo. Using Discard Digits set to Predot strips out the 9011, then the +! transform mask gets it into E.164 for proper international routing. Not convinced A or E are needed unless they ask about strict standards.
Order is important here, so B, C. If you pick Predot without the mask, you lose the digits you need.
Probably B and C. Mask does +! for E.164 and predot removes the 9011 prefix.
I don’t think setting number plan/type (D or E) is required unless your route list or trunk specifically matches on those. Main thing here is stripping the 9011 with Predot (C) and reformatting with +! mask (B). E looks tempting but it’s a common trap in UCM practice sets. Correct me if you’ve seen a case where E actually changes the routing behavior here.
B/C. Discard Digits with Predot chops off the 9011, then Called Party Transform Mask +! formats it to E.164 which is what UCM wants for international calls. I think this matches other practice sets but correct me if that's off.
B/C? E looks tempting since it's about international calls, but similar exam questions have B and C as correct. Setting Predot and the +! mask handles the transformation. If I'm missing something let me know.
E , since you're routing international calls. Setting Called Party Number Type to International makes sense so the downstream systems know how to treat the call. I'm not totally sure if that's required in this scenario or just best practice, but that's what I'd pick here. Anyone see it a different way?
Be respectful. No spam.
