Q: 10
What is a difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?
Options
Discussion
Option C makes sense to me since it mentions both vendors and standards bodies like IETF, which usually get involved with YANG models. I've seen a similar question on practice exams and went for C, thinking it was about platform independence. Might be off though, let me know if you see it differently.
I don’t think it’s A. C makes sense if you consider standards bodies like IETF are involved too.
Option A is correct. Native YANG models are usually built by vendors and tied to features unique to their own platforms. OpenConfig is more about cross-vendor compatibility, so that's the key diff here. Pretty sure on this unless I missed something.
D . Not totally confident but native models being by individual developers sounds plausible if they're not focusing on vendor-specific stuff.
Yeah, always seen native models as vendor-specific configs, so A is right here.
Its C, since native models can be made by vendors or standards bodies so A feels like a trap.
A imo. Saw a similar one on a practice exam and native models came up as vendor-specific every time.
Probably A . Native models are vendor-specific, option B mixes up OpenConfig and native.
Seriously Cisco, these options are worded to trip you up. It's definitely A because native models are by vendors for their own gear, not cross-platform like OpenConfig. Anyone disagree?
Had something like this in a mock, pretty sure it's A. Native models always came up as vendor-specific, platform-tied stuff, while OpenConfig is more collaborative and multi-vendor. Let me know if I'm off here.
Be respectful. No spam.
