Yeah, A and E are good picks here. Advanced Performance Charts show near real-time stats in the client, and esxtop gives live data from the CLI. C (resxtop) is more for remote hosts, not always all VMs. Correct me if I missed something.
resxtop for live metrics, not esxtop. Maybe I'm missing a detail, though.Yeah, A and E make sense here. Advanced Performance Charts let you watch CPU usage close to real time in the vSphere Client, and esxtop is the go-to for live performance from the CLI. B (esxcli) doesn't give real-time stats like that. Pretty sure that's spot on but open to other views.
Medium-sized vCenter needs at least 8 vCPUs and 30 GB memory for that many hosts and VMs. So, D and B fit here based on VMware sizing guides. Pretty sure about this but open if someone has newer sizing info.
Pretty sure it's A since the "Fatal error: 39" is usually thrown when Secure Boot can't verify the kernel signature, not just a random driver or VIB. D can cause issues, but that specific error points to the kernel itself being tampered. If someone has different experience, let me know.
Option B and E here. Supervisor gets stretched across all zones, not created per zone. Trap is A, but that's how the legacy setup worked before zonal topology came out. Anyone disagree?
That’s how vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor works now.
After removing an ESXi host from a cluster for maintenance, a number of virtual machines have
encountered the warning seen in the exhibit. After re-adding the ESXi, the issue is resolved. Which
step should the administrator take to move the triggered alarm to its normal state?