Q: 7
An administrator has mapped three vSphere zones to three vSphere clusters.
Which two statements are true for this vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement? (Choose
two.)
Options
Discussion
Maybe D and A. I saw something similar on a practice exam where it indicated Supervisors could be mapped per zone, and Namespaces would stay inside that zone. Not totally sure, anybody else see it this way?
Option B and E here. Supervisor gets stretched across all zones, not created per zone. Trap is A, but that's how the legacy setup worked before zonal topology came out. Anyone disagree?
Nice, clear question on Tanzu zones. B and E are correct.
B E
That’s how vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor works now.
That’s how vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor works now.
I get the confusion, but in zonal Supervisor mode it's a single Supervisor stretched over all zones (so B), and Namespaces aren't locked to one-they spread across (E). This tripped me up at first because old clusters worked differently. Let me know if you see any docs saying otherwise.
It’s B and E for zonal Supervisor, since one Supervisor spans all zones and Namespaces aren’t tied to a single zone. Pretty sure, vSphere 8 changed this from the older per-cluster setup. If anyone sees it different, let me know.
Be respectful. No spam.
