Q: 1
Existing environment:
3 vSphere clusters, 5 hosts each.
Networking = vDS.
Storage = NFSv3.
Managed by single vCenter.
Architect decides to create a new VCF fleet with a single VCF instance.
What design implication should be documented?
Options
Discussion
Option B saw a similar question in exam reports and that's what was picked.
C/D? I’ve seen NFS setups where vSAN gets applied by mistake, so clusters moving to vSAN config could also be a concern.
Had something like this in a mock, pretty sure it's B.
B, not A. Migrating vCenter off the cluster is needed here. Pretty sure that's the key design point.
A NSX usually isn’t automatically deployed in every scenario unless you pick that workflow.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 2
The architect documented a requirement for 99.95% high availability to meet the customer's
resiliency needs.
Which two physical design decisions will help meet this requirement in the management domain?
(Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
A/D. Only those actually boost management domain uptime to 99.95 percent, vCenter HA plus high restart both target core resilience.
Makes sense to go with A and D for this one.
Why would you pick B or E for high availability in the management domain? EtherChannel isn't directly related to vCenter resiliency. Shouldn't vCenter HA (A) and high restart priority (D) be the key choices to really meet that 99.95% uptime?
Nah, not B or E. It's A and D, EtherChannel is a common trap here.
Maybe B and E. Question is super clear and similar to what I've seen in exam reports.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 3
An architect is responsible for designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud for a
customer. The architect noted the following requirements during a design workshop:
Co-locate application workloads with VCF management component workloads within the same
vSphere cluster.
Shared storage data is always available and 100% current in the event of a single site outage.
Have two sites available no more than 10 miles apart (10ms latency) connected with high-speed
network technology to host their virtual infrastructure.
Protect against outages of a single site designated as an availability zone.
Which two storage technologies could meet the stated requirements? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
Probably D and E for this. vSAN supports stretched clusters with synchronous writes and vVols can do it if the backend array supports sync replication. C is tempting but FC alone doesn't guarantee zero RPO or site-level protection. Let me know if you think otherwise.
D and E. Only vSAN and vVols with replication meet the always-available, zero RPO stretched cluster setup across two sites.
I get why C looks tempting, but only D and E can handle synchronous replication for that active-active site setup.
D and E imo. Saw a similar question in exam reports, vSAN and vVols with array-based replication fit these requirements.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 4
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) fleet. The following information has been
provided by the customer:
Due to budget constraints, the solution must utilize the existing server hardware.
The existing server hardware consists of server models from the same vendor but different
generations.
There are ten servers available for use in this solution.
Management and Business workloads should be hosted in different clusters.
What design decision should the architect make for the lifecycle management of the solution based
on this information?
Options
Discussion
Remembered seeing almost the same scenario in a mock-definitely B. Management and workload clusters on different hardware generations just can't use a single composite image reliably.
C or B here, but pretty sure it's B. If the servers are from different generations you'll likely hit driver or firmware mismatches if you try to use a single image. Best practice is a separate vLCM image per cluster matching the underlying hardware. Makes maintenance way easier too, but open to other ideas.
Its B. Had a similar question on a practice test and different hardware generations usually need their own image per cluster.
D imo. The question's pretty straightforward with cluster split and image management, nice clarity.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 5
During a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) architectural design workshop, one of the stakeholders
made the following comment:
“The company has just used the remaining budget to purchase eight vSAN Ready Nodes for this
project.”
How would the architect classify this statement within the conceptual model document?
Options
Discussion
Definitely D. Official guide clarifies this as a constraint in design scenarios like this.
C or D? I'm leaning more towards D since the purchase of hardware before design usually restricts your options, so that's a constraint. But part of me wonders if someone could see it as a requirement. Not 100% sure, but pretty sure D is the VMware way here. Agree?
D
I’d say D, not C. The pre-bought hardware locks down what's possible, classic trap is confusing it with requirement.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 6
As part of the initial design workshop, one of the customer stakeholders has stated the following:
• All Virtual Machines must be encrypted.
How would the architect classify this statement?
Options
Discussion
Option C, not B. Saying "must be encrypted" points to a clear requirement, B is easy to mix up but that's more about limits on your solution. Seen this type in practice tests, pretty sure C's the right call.
encountered exactly similar question in my exam on a test, this one's C.
I don’t think it’s B. All VMs "must be encrypted" is pretty direct, so C fits better since it's a clear requirement from the stakeholder, not just a limitation or boundary. Constraints usually limit how you achieve something, but here it tells us *what* must be implemented. I think C is safest but open to other takes if someone disagrees.
Pretty sure it's C here. Had something like this in a mock and the key is that "must" makes it a requirement, not a constraint. Constraint would be something that limits your design options, but this is just what the solution has to do. Anyone see it differently?
Its B, seen similar question in the official guide and practice test.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 7
An architect has made an assumption that existing support staff are adequately skilled to operate the
proposed infrastructure design.
The risk associated with this assumption would be that existing support staff are inadequately skilled
to operate the proposed infrastructure design. How would the architect mitigate the risk?
Options
Discussion
Option B Official guide and hands-on labs both say training is best for this risk.
C. I remember a similar scenario from labs where skills assessment came first.
Its B, training actually reduces the risk. Skills assessment (C) is just the first step but doesn't fix it.
B , C just identifies the gap but doesn't actually mitigate the risk. Training staff addresses it directly.
You'd want B here. Training the existing staff directly addresses the skills gap risk. Makes sense to upskill the current team.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 8
Requirement: The solution must identify any configuration changes made to the Management
Infrastructure every 30 days.
Which three design decisions should the architect make to meet the stated requirements? (Choose
three.)
Options
Discussion
A, B, D tbh. Official VMware guides and practice labs point to those steps for config drift checks.
C isn't enough on its own. You need templates for both the Management Cluster (A) and the NSX Manager (D), plus the actual drift detection scheduled (B). They're just asking to identify changes, not to remediate them. Makes sense from VCF perspective, but open to pushback.
A B, D all day. Config templates for both cluster and NSX plus scheduled drift checks is what VCF expects.
A. B, D
Makes sense to pick A, B, D here. You need the templates for both Management Cluster and NSX Manager, then schedule drift checks every 30 days. Seen similar logic in official guides and labs. Pretty sure that's what they're looking for.
Its A, B, D
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 9
During the design workshop, the customer stated the following requirement:
• The solution must comply with the organization's security standards.
Which two design decisions should be included in the logical design for the workload domain?
(Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
Yeah, D and E make sense here because they're both focused on security standards at the logical level. Specifying SHA-2 for certs (D) directly addresses cryptographic policy, and E is about trust management processes between NSX managers. Pretty sure that's what the question wants since A/B/C are more about implementation. Agree?
D imo. Logical design needs to specify things like cert algorithm (SHA-2 or higher) and thumbprint practice, not things like hardware sizing.
Option D and E. Matches what you'd set at the logical design level, not implementation specifics.
Its D and E, seen similar guidance in the official design guide and practice exams.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 10
During a requirements gathering workshop, several business and technical requirements were
captured from the customer.
Which requirement will be classified as a Business Requirement?
Options
Discussion
A imo, had something like this in a mock. End-user experience points to a business objective, not implementation details. The others sound more technical. Pretty sure that's what they want here, but open to different views.
Probably A-D's just a classic trap, that's a technical SLA not really a business objective.
I'm pretty sure A fits as a business requirement since it's about user experience, which is a business goal. The others feel more technical or operational. Anyone disagree or see another angle?
No way it's D, that's more of a technical/non-functional requirement. A is the business goal here.
A tbh
Its A
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 1 of 20 · Page 1 / 2