Q: 4
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) fleet. The following information has been
provided by the customer:
Due to budget constraints, the solution must utilize the existing server hardware.
The existing server hardware consists of server models from the same vendor but different
generations.
There are ten servers available for use in this solution.
Management and Business workloads should be hosted in different clusters.
What design decision should the architect make for the lifecycle management of the solution based
on this information?
Options
Discussion
Remembered seeing almost the same scenario in a mock-definitely B. Management and workload clusters on different hardware generations just can't use a single composite image reliably.
C or B here, but pretty sure it's B. If the servers are from different generations you'll likely hit driver or firmware mismatches if you try to use a single image. Best practice is a separate vLCM image per cluster matching the underlying hardware. Makes maintenance way easier too, but open to other ideas.
Its B. Had a similar question on a practice test and different hardware generations usually need their own image per cluster.
D imo. The question's pretty straightforward with cluster split and image management, nice clarity.
Be respectful. No spam.