Q: 3
You are troubleshooting a connectivity issue between two compute instances within the same VCN.
Both instances are in different subnets. Instance A (IPv4: 10.0.1.10, IPv6: fc00:1:1::10) can ping its
subnet gateway (10.0.1.1) and can ping the IPv6 address of Instance B (fc00:1:2::20), but cannot ping
Instance B's IPv4 address (10.0.2.20). The security lists and network security groups (NSGs) are
configured to allow all traffic between the subnets. The route table for Instance A’s subnet has a rule
to route all traffic destined to 10.0.2.0/24 subnet to the VCN Local Peering Gateway. What is the
most probable cause?
Options
Discussion
C/D? OCI networking makes me pull my hair out sometimes, especially with these route table details. Still, leaning B since in every similar question I've seen, missing a route back for IPv4 breaks ping but IPv6 works. Not 100% sure though.
Option D had something like this in a mock.
B not A. Thought maybe A since IPv6 sometimes confuses things in OCI, but since IPv6 works and security lists allow all, feels like subnet B’s route table is the real gotcha here. Bit on the fence since LPGs aren’t typical inside one VCN-open to pushback if I missed something.
B or maybe A if there's some funky VCN-level config, but it's almost always B when IPv4 fails and IPv6 works fine. In OCI, you need both subnets' route tables to cover the path each way or ICMP replies never get back. I could see a weird edge case if LPG was misused, but that's not typical here. Anyone run into this with default VCNs?
I don’t think it’s B. A makes sense if IPv6 wasn’t enabled, the ping wouldn’t work at all for that address. The weird thing is both instances ping on IPv6, so network config oddity maybe? Not fully convinced but it gets tricky with OCI peering.
B, and I’ve seen similar cases in Oracle practice tests where route tables trip people up. The official study guide has examples of this kind of return path issue. Pretty sure that's it, but check the docs if you want to be certain.
D . Ping works with IPv6 so not sure why that wouldn't apply here.
Option B similar scenario pops up in Oracle docs and the official study guide covers subnet route table configs well. Practice labs on OCI networking help a lot with these path/return-path type routing questions. Not totally sure, but that’s where I’d focus.
B here, pretty sure. Trap is A but IPv6 works fine, so routing on B’s subnet is the issue.
A isn’t it, B fits better. If Instance B’s subnet route table doesn’t send 10.0.1.0/24 back to the VCN or local link, the IPv4 ping response can’t make it home, even if security is wide open. That lines up with what I’ve seen-correct me if I’m missing something.
Be respectful. No spam.