
Q: 11
SIMULATION
Back-to-Back Supply Creation On-Hand Flow
The back-to-back on-hand available (ATP) flow is the simplest in terms of the number of steps that
constitute the flow. This flow occurs where on hand supply is available in the fulfillment warehouse
for the ordered back-to-back item at the time of order promising. Because on-hand goods already
exist in the form of on hand, Oracle Supply Chain Orchestration directly sends a request to reserve
the on hand quantity against the back-to-back sales order. You can ship the sales order immediately
after the reservation is created.
The following figure shows the back-to-back supply creation on-hand flow.


Your Answer
Discussion
Reserve on-hand inventory. Pretty sure that's what Oracle does first when ATP finds stock available, skips all the extra steps like procurement or transfer. Some might confuse this with make-to-order but here it's just a direct reservation then ship. Let me know if you see it differently.
Does the question specify if you have to describe the process in detail or just name the key step? That would change what I write here.
Makes sense, but I'd write "immediate shipment" for the main process here. Not 100 percent sure if that's what they're after.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 12
SIMULATION
How Back-to-Back Fulfillment Works
The back-to-back process flow is one in which specific sales order demand triggers supply creation
and a link is established between the sales order and the supply.
An organization procures goods from an internal or external supplier or source to a specific
warehouse from where you can combine those goods with others to create a single shipment to the
customer.
Back-to-back supply processes are similar to regular supply processes that deliver supply to a
warehouse except for one difference; the back-to-back supply is always reserved to an order
management fulfillment line.
At a high level, you can think of back-to-back fulfillment as a three-step process:
1.
Creation of a customer sales order (source of demand).
2.
Creation and fulfillment of supply document (source of supply) to the fulfillment warehouse.
3.
Shipment of sales order from the fulfillment warehouse to the customer.
However, the back-to-back flow is truly a highly integrated process flow involving several Oracle
Fusion Cloud applications. The following figure shows the back-to-back process flow in detail. An
explanation for each number follows the figure.


Your Answer
Discussion
Nah, I don't think it's "See the figure"-looks like a trap since there isn’t a clear reference. "See the".
Is the answer just “See the”? That feels incomplete, what exactly are we supposed to reference here?
Seriously Oracle questions are always so wordy! "See the"
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 13
SIMULATION
Back to Back fulfillment
Overview of Back-to-Back Fulfillment
The back-to-back fulfillment process is one in which specific sales order demand triggers supply
creation, and a link is established between the sales order and the supply.
Note: Back-to-back flow is currently supported only for discrete manufacturing.
The following figure provides a high-level flow diagram showing the back-to-back supply creation
and fulfillment process flow.
Back-to-back fulfillment is where supply is procured and then received at a warehouse only after an
order is placed.
The supply is reserved against a sales order until shipping.
This process provides support to create and link supply after a sales order is entered and scheduled,
allowing you to reduce your inventory while maintaining the ability to respond to customer
demands.
You create supply for a back-to-back order using one or more of the following back-to-back flows:
•
Buy: Procurement from an external supplier.
•
Make: Production in an internal manufacturing facility (includes in-house manufacturing and
contract manufacturing).
•
Transfer: Transfer from another warehouse.
•
On hand: Reservation of on-hand supply in the fulfillment organization.
Note: For information about back-to-back flows for contract manufacturing, see the Implementing
Contract Manufacturing chapter in this guide.
After the supply is received into the fulfillment warehouse, the back-to-back order is ready for
shipment to the customer.
Back-to-back fulfillment is where supply is procured and then received at a warehouse only after an
order is placed.
The supply is reserved against a sales order until shipping.
This process provides support to create and link supply after a sales order is entered and scheduled,
allowing you to reduce your inventory while maintaining the ability to respond to customer
demands.
You create supply for a back-to-back order using one or more of the following back-to-back flows:
•
Buy: Procurement from an external supplier.
•
Make: Production in an internal manufacturing facility (includes in-house manufacturing and
contract manufacturing).
•
Transfer: Transfer from another warehouse.
•
On hand: Reservation of on-hand supply in the fulfillment organization.
Note: For information about back-to-back flows for contract manufacturing, see the Implementing
Contract Manufacturing chapter in this guide.
After the supply is received into the fulfillment warehouse, the back-to-back order is ready for
shipment to the customer.Your Answer
Discussion
Oracle's back-to-back fulfillment always seems overcomplicated compared to other vendors. Anyway, it's "See the" for this one.
Why is "See the" correct here instead of something like "Create supply order"? That feels like a distractor.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 14
SIMULATION
Set Up Back-to-Back Transfer Flow
The topic explains what you need to do for setting up back-to-back transfer flow.
In the Oracle Product Information Management, ensure that the Item is Back-to-Back enabled.
In Oracle Global Order Promising:
1.
Set up a global sourcing rule with Type as Transfer from. Set the organization as the
organization requesting the transfer (example, Warehouse 1).
2.
Set up a local sourcing rule for the organization (in this example, Warehouse 1) Type as
Transfer from, from the organization that has the stock from which the transfer will take place
(example, Warehouse 2).
3.
Set up an ATP rule with the Promising Mode as Supply chain availability search.
4.
Ensure that the Supply chain availability search attributes are enabled according to your
requirements. For example, you might want the application to search components and resources to
include on-hand or in-transit Supply Types or fulfillment lines Demand Types.
5.
Set the ATP Rule Assignment as required.
6.
Set the sourcing assignments for the sourcing rules that you defined in steps 1 and 2.
7.
Ensure that the assignment level used for the global sourcing rule doesn't include any
Organization.
8.
Refresh and restart the Order Promising Server for ATP Rules and Sourcing.
With this setup:
•
The global rule is used to source the item from Warehouse 1 if there is stock available to
reserve.
•
If there's no stock on hand, Global Order Promising uses the local rule to transfer the item
from Warehouse 2 to Warehouse 1.
Your Answer
Discussion
See the
Yeah, you need to make sure the item is back-to-back enabled in PIM first, but you can actually configure ATP rules and sourcing rules in either order, as long as both are complete before assigning and activating them. Key thing is that your global and local sourcing rules work together and the ATP rule is set to supply chain availability search. At the end, refresh and restart the Order Promising Server to apply changes. Pretty sure that's the real flow-let me know if I'm missing something!
Do you have to set up ATP rules before sourcing rules for this, or is the order not strict? Little confused.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 15
Item A is transacted in lots. Your customer wants to pick more than the requested quantity for Item A
during pick slip confirmation.
How can this requirement be achieved?
Options
Discussion
C tbh, saw a similar question in exam reports. Only option C lets you control overpick at the item level.
Probably C. A is tempting, but that would impact all items, not just Item A. Anyone disagree?
If the question said "for all items in the org," then A might fit, but since it's just Item A, C should be right. Anyone know if "best practice" would change that?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 11 of 20 · Page 2 / 2