Is the question specifically asking for all possible roles, or only the primary function as configured in the task? That would affect whether billing and payable invoices are in scope.
C or D depending on what exactly the question means by "functional". If they're asking for core modules only, then A, C, D make sense, but if "Order Capturing" is included in scope (like end-to-end process), then B could be right. Is order capture considered part of orchestration here?
Maybe C. Since the frequency is weekly and you run it before the next cycle on Nov 14, I think nothing gets generated. Not totally sure though, can someone confirm?
Looks like it's A, since enabling that option skips the need for manual pick release. Oracle docs and practice tests mention this. Anyone using the official guide notice anything different?
Option A looks right, but does the question mean you want every line to bypass manual pick or just some of them? If 'all' lines should be auto-released, I'd go A, but if granular control is needed maybe B would fit better.
Back-to-Back Supply Creation Buy Flow
The supply document for a back-to-back buy flow is a purchase order. Based on supply
recommendations from Oracle Global Order Promising, a purchase order is created and reserved
against the sales order. When the purchase order is received by the supplier, on hand is created to
ship out the back-to-back sales order.
The following figure shows the back-to-back supply creation buy flow.

Can someone clarify if the buy flow always means a purchase order gets created, or does it depend on Oracle finding on-hand stock first? If there’s no inventory, I get that PO generation is triggered, but is there any scenario where buy flow skips that step?
The supply document for a back-to-back make flow is a work order. As soon as the work order is
created in Oracle Fusion Cloud Manufacturing, it's tied to the back-to-back sales order in the form of
a reservation in inventory. The work order goes through the regular production process and the work
order completion transaction issues finished goods to inventory.
Note: Back-to-back flow is currently supported for only discrete manufacturing.
The following figure shows the back-to-back supply creation make flow.
Back-to-Back Supply Creation Transfer Flow
The supply document for a back-to-back transfer flow is a transfer order. The transfer order is created
in inventory and reserved against the back-to-back sales order. When the transfer order is ready to
be fulfilled, an interorganization shipment moves goods from the source organization to the
destination organization. An interorganization receipt in the destination organization (which is also
the fulfillment warehouse on the back-to-back sales order) creates on hand to fulfill the sales order.
The following figure shows the back-to-back supply creation transfer flow.Hmm, I think this depends on whether they mean "make" or "transfer" flow. For back-to-back make flow, the answer is probably "work order" since that's the supply doc tied to the SO in discrete manufacturing. But if it's transfer flow, then it'd be a "transfer order". So I'd say make sure you read for which scenario they're asking!